Tuesday, April 21, 2009

The painful truth about trainers: Are running shoes a waste of money?

(Courtesy of plee and The Mailonline)

Thrust enhancers, roll bars, microchips...the $20 billion running - shoe industry wants us to believe that the latest technologies will cushion every stride. Yet in this extract from his controversial new book, Christopher McDougall claims that injury rates for runners are actually on the rise, that everything we've been told about running shoes is wrong - and that it might even be better to go barefoot...

At Stanford University, California, two sales representatives from Nike were watching the athletics team practise. Part of their job was to gather feedback from the company's sponsored runners about which shoes they preferred.
Unfortunately, it was proving difficult that day as the runners all seemed to prefer... nothing.

'Didn't we send you enough shoes?' they asked head coach Vin Lananna. They had, he was just refusing to use them.
'I can't prove this,' the well-respected coach told them.

'But I believe that when my runners train barefoot they run faster and suffer fewer injuries.'

Nike sponsored the Stanford team as they were the best of the very best. Needless to say, the reps were a little disturbed to hear that Lananna felt the best shoes they had to offer them were not as good as no shoes at all.
When I was told this anecdote it came as no surprise. I'd spent years struggling with a variety of running-related injuries, each time trading up to more expensive shoes, which seemed to make no difference. I'd lost count of the amount of money I'd handed over at shops and sports-injury clinics - eventually ending with advice from my doctor to give it up and 'buy a bike'.

And I wasn't on my own. Every year, anywhere from 65 to 80 per cent of all runners suffer an injury. No matter who you are, no matter how much you run, your odds of getting hurt are the same. It doesn't matter if you're male or female, fast or slow, pudgy or taut as a racehorse, your feet are still in the danger zone.

But why? How come Roger Bannister could charge out of his Oxford lab every day, pound around a hard cinder track in thin leather slippers, not only getting faster but never getting hurt, and set a record before lunch?

















Then there's the secretive Tarahumara tribe, the best long-distance runners in the world. These are a people who live in basic conditions in Mexico, often in caves without running water, and run with only strips of old tyre or leather thongs strapped to the bottom of their feet. They are virtually barefoot.

Come race day, the Tarahumara don't train. They don't stretch or warm up. They just stroll to the starting line, laughing and bantering, and then go for it, ultra-running for two full days, sometimes covering over 300 miles, non-stop. For the fun of it. One of them recently came first in a prestigious 100-mile race wearing nothing but a toga and sandals. He was 57 years old.

When it comes to preparation, the Tarahumara prefer more of a Mardi Gras approach. In terms of diet, lifestyle and training technique, they're a track coach's nightmare. They drink like New Year's Eve is a weekly event, tossing back enough corn-based beer and homemade tequila brewed from rattlesnake corpses to floor an army.

Unlike their Western counterparts, the Tarahumara don't replenish their bodies with electrolyte-rich sports drinks. They don't rebuild between workouts with protein bars; in fact, they barely eat any protein at all, living on little more than ground corn spiced up by their favourite delicacy, barbecued mouse.

FULL ARTICLE - CLICK HERE - THIS IS A MUST READ FOR ALL RUNNERS

Simon says: - This is a really long article but very very interesting reading - you instinctively know that what it's telling you is spot on - we've been conned by the running shoe manufacturers for decades. A few touch points that I took from the article: -

1) The most expensive shoes cause the most injuries - statistically this is a fact although it may have something to do with the people investing the most may be doing so because they run the most. Equally, they may be like I was when I was a bit naive, I bought the most expensive Nike's the shop had and then trained and ran a 1/2 marathon and couldn't run for 18 months afterwards due to them being completely the wrong shoe for my running gait.

2) I like the fact that the Tarahumara tribe drink like madmen and still run - I do often find myself in that boat - I wonder if I was a Tarahumara Indian in some previous life?

3) Stretching before running causes injury - ABSOLUTELY - I've been telling people this for years - stretch when you're warmed up but not before - overstretching afterwards has also caused me terrible Achilles Tendinitis too so be careful.

3 comments:

Keat Seong said...

does this actually mean that the next shoe we buy should be a thin soled one??? i find it weird, when i wear a "racer", my feet will get sore compared to when i wear a cushioned "trainer" ... does that mean my feet didn't evolved???

Anonymous said...

I fully agree with you that stretching should be done when warmed up.

Unknown said...

Hi all: There you are. Barefoot running is good. Growing up running barefoot or wearing the simple canvas school shoes with thin sole, I find running barefoot natural. I was running before the birth of running shoes in the 70s. Nike founders started running shoes thingy in the 70s using waffle maker to cast the sole of the running shoes. The rest is history with the boom of street run and the aggressive marketing across the world. Applying common sense and logic, running barefoot or shoes with thin sole maintain the biomechanic of our body in running. The thick sole of running shoes esp at heel obstruct the original running gait.

To Keat Seong: a sore feet is nothing compared to injury to joints and run muscles.